|

ORDER NOW AT:
 |
|
 |
Private Intervention |
| |
|
The Cotter Model of
Intervention & Treatment
The goal of an intervention should be to motivate the
impaired person (IP) to WANT help for their addiction problem, not
just accept help.
Why interventions fail?
Effective with patients ages 18-86,
The Cotter Model, unlike the Johnson confrontation, blends the
drug addiction intervention or alcoholism intervention smoothly into the entire treatment and recovery
process. It is not treated as an isolated event. As a recovering
alcoholic, Cotter’s private and confidential, one-on-one meeting
with the IP is conducted with open dialogue, not as a threat and
demand filled lecture. In this compassionate atmosphere, treated
with dignity and respect, the IP is at ease to discuss their
feelings about their addiction, alcohol, prescription, or other
drug, and getting drug abuse help or alcoholism help . This is a major
step toward entering treatment with a positive attitude and
enhances the prognosis for a positive outcome. In a sense, the
idea of getting help for their alcoholism becomes their idea. When
combined with The Cotter Model’s Year Long Continuing Care
Program, the stage is set for a long-lasting program of recovery.
For many obvious reasons, it is critical for the intervention to
be performed by a recovering alcoholic. It is also important to
differentiate between the Johnson Model, where the family and/or
friends do the intervention, while the "interventionist" assists
and The Cotter Model where Bruce Cotter actually conducts the
intervention.
By design, the Johnson Model, or family/group intervention is
usually a confrontational, demeaning, embarrassing
"surprise-attack" on the IP. Consequently, the IP’s existing
feelings of anger, guilt, shame and paranoia are exacerbated. This
atmosphere, combined with the negative emotions of those doing the
intervening, can doom the addiction intervention before it even starts. Even
if the IP agrees to enter a treatment facility for help, they
usually comply just to shut everyone up and to get the group off
their back. They feel they have been
verbally bludgeoned into submission. Patients entering treatment
following such a
confrontation, may be so angry, it might be several days, or weeks
before the counselors "break through" the anger and begin the
education necessary to address recovery. In some cases, the anger
lasts for years. Too often, the IP will leave treatment before
completion and once home, will continue to drink as before. Now,
the people who tried to provide drug addiction help, by investing considerable emotion,
time and money, are angry and disappointed. This makes the next
offer of help, if there is one, even less likely to succeed.
CASE NOTES " The Daughter-In-Law"
(When They Won't Quit, page 33)
This case was set in motion by the parents of a using son.
Their son's wife had become the breadwinner and may have felt more
important when her husband used. She told me that my intervention
wasn't necessary--her husband just concluded a big deal three
months ago. Upon investigation, it turned out to be three years
ago. Now, I explained to the wife that the advantage comes to the
interventionist when he catches the patient off guard--by
surprise--so that they don't have time to build their defenses. I
called her on her cell phone to determine the best time for me to
come to the home. However, when I reached her, she nonchalantly
called her husband (the user) over to the phone and said, "Honey,
there's someone here who wants to speak with you!" That faux pas
resulted in an additional two months of agony for her husband
before I could get him into treatment.
CASE NOTES "The Hotel Room"
(When They Won't Quit, page 74)
One intervention was to take place in a luxury New York hotel
room. The father, a small, quiet man, was to take me up to the
room and introduce me to his son, who was addicted to heroin, and
leave us. When he opened the door, the father exploded. He saw his
son using and "involved" with two prostitutes, who were also
using. The old man exploded, shrieked and lunged for his son's
throat. It was a terrible fight. I finally got them apart. The
hotel security came. I dismissed the cast of characters and
finally had the young man alone in the room where I did the
intervention. It took two more months on the phone to get him into
treatment. He did go to treatment and remains clean and sober.

|